Two Christian responses to war
When the news is full of wars and rumours of wars it's easy to be afraid, but how should Christians respond?
When the news is full of wars and rumours of wars it's easy to be afraid, but how should Christians respond?
The love of Christ is a love so potent that it spills over — even in dangerous situations.
In Part 1, I delved into the question of whether there was a problem with Islamism in the UK and concluded that there is. Here I explore some possible responses.
Neither revisionists nor traditionalists could get on board.
It seems that the only acceptable "new and imaginative" ways forward are those which rely on people agreeing to disagree.
The noise on both sides is overwhelming, but is it possible to have a more balanced, Christian perspective?
Despite spending over £1m on two expert reviews into their safeguarding practices, it seems the Church of England still believes that the bishops know best.
Surely we have a Christian duty to speak out on topics and causes where very few others are engaging?
It seems the only biblical symbol permitted in modern Britain is the culturally misappropriated rainbow.
If you believe in the power of prayer, join us in prophetically reimagining this world into something beautiful.
This may be our last chance before the political terror in Russia escalates to Stalinist dimensions and the only hope of lasting peace in Europe is gone for a long time.
In the rejection of God, a culture tends to lose its mind and look for other saviours.
Like Navalny, can we rest in the sure knowledge of God's sovereignty even amidst awful circumstances?